Sith happens

05.23.2005

Technorati tag:

By now everyone who's going to see it, has seen it. So here's a (brief) list of my objections to the final Star Wars installment:

  1. Padme, the only female character in the new series, went from strong, proactive heroine to whimpering stay-at-home moll. Of course she's pregnant, but she's still a senator. Couldn't she've done something (anything!) besides wait patiently for Anakin? Yes, this is supposed to be a story about Anakin, but ultimately it's also a story of Luke — and Padme was his mother, he inherited some of who he is from her.
  2. We're supposed to believe that this woman, capable of unravelling a plot against her planet, brave enough to take risks in preventing it, and intuitive enough to maneuver politically doesn't notice that the man she shares her bed w/ is possibly going to betray the Republic? Nor, as senator, does she suspect the Chancellor in any way? Or start making secret meetings w/ other senators and plotting (as she did in Ep I)?
  3. On a related note: Why is no effort made to make us care about Senator Organa? W/o warning, he suddenly emerges in the last few minutes as an important character, and we're supposed to believe that for some reason he cares for Padme enough to risk his life (and ultimately his entire planet) to protect her & her unborn children? Perhaps some character development should've been in order. Again, knowing something about the people who raised Leia is important, since they helped mold her.
  4. I find it hard to believe that the entire Jedi order could be destroyed in the course of a two minute film montage. Or that the Jedi temple (their headquarters!) could be overrun in the course of a single afternoon by one troubled young Jedi (who's rather easily defeated by a single other Jedi) & some clone troops (who're easily bested by only two Jedi). It'd be nice to've seen at least some resistence. An amazing, powerful scene would've been to see that little boy look at Anakin, know death's coming, and raise his light saber in defiance.
  5. The story would've been better w/ less jumping from planet to planet. There seemed a strong determination to show us virtually ever planet ever assembled in the current set of movies, w/o actually giving us any reason to care about any of them, except as pretty CGI backdrops for bad dialogue. Also, why does it take days/weeks to go from one planet to another in all previous movies, but it's near instantaneous in this one?
  6. Why are the Jedi such terrible tacticians? Yoda commands an army to support the Wookies against a droid army attack. So he decides to land his forces in a defensive position (couldn't he have attacked the droid army from the rear?), and then waits for the droid forces to power-up their generators. Huh? Oh, wait, does that explain why the Jedi get wiped out in a two-minute montage?
  7. Anakin's acting was worse than Captain Kirk's. Or rather, a Captain Kirk who thinks he's a Jean-Luc Picard.
  8. No one ever suspected Palpatine was evil? Ever? His entire home was decorated w/ Sith art. No one suspected anything? Really?
  9. Back to Organa. We're given a sense in the first movie (IV) that the rebellion's been going on for a while. And w/ Senator Organa barely surviving an attack by clone troopers, we get a sense that the seeds for the rebellion were planted the day Palpatine declared himself emperor. So why not develop that storyline further? A great chance to give Padme a stronger role, plus get Senator Organa involved so we'd get a sense of why she (and the Jedi) would trust him, and what preparations they make for the future.
  10. Why do I get the feeling from these films that plot, dialogue, character took a back seat to CGI, CGI, and more CGI?

After that, many objections are quite minor. Little plot holes (e.g. Padme dies giving birth, but Leia clearly remembers her birth mother in VI). But mostly, the dialogue was atrocious. And some scenes were just too much (e.g. Vader's "Frankenstein" moment). In the end, I was left pretty cold. I was supposed to care about Anakin, but I just didn't. I didn't hate him, I didn't feel sorry for him, I just didn't care. Or, rather, I just wanted the film to be over.

Now I'll just wait for the next season of Battlestar Galactica, and sci-fi that actually has gripping drama, sharp dialogue, in a universe where people actually eat, bleed, sweat, and even use toilets.

Posted by Miguel at 11:58 AM

Comments

How about the line "Either you are with us...or you are our enemy"? *Too* many parallels with the War on Terror.

They should have just showed the movie with no dialogue.

Posted by: eduardo at May 24, 2005 12:33 PM

read somewhere that Lucas was the writer for this script. Didn't he learn his lesson from the second movie?

Posted by: Stephanie at May 24, 2005 02:10 PM

LALALALALALALALA

(Haven't seen it, yet.)

Agreed on Battlestar Galactica. New season starts in June, right?

Posted by: tom at May 24, 2005 02:22 PM

Wow, i agree with all of that. Its almost as if all your complaints were my complaints.

i also didnt like the final lightsabre battle. Its either it was too anticlimactic, or i was desensitized by all the lightsabring earlier in the movie. Remember how excited we were to see lightsabre duels in the last movies? This oine was just "eh".

Posted by: ryan at May 24, 2005 02:42 PM

Yes, Hayden Christianson's (sp?) acting was atrocious!

Posted by: Kim at May 24, 2005 07:32 PM

Here I go...

1) Agreed. Padme took a surprisingly nominal position in this film. I would have liked to see more of her. My complaint isn't that she wasn't active in the senate or whatever anymore, it's that--hey! This girl has like a dozen little clones and servants and droids around her all the time...NO one noticed her pregnant??? No one noticed that Anakin kept sleeping over at her apartment (I assume her apartment is in the poshest area of Curosant (sp?)).
2) I agree with your protest, but I do think that she's justified in how she handled things. She had said earlier that she thinks this senate is a farce. It makes sense that she would back off if she thought it had no real power.
3) Organa is disturbingly underrepresented in this film--and the preceeding three. When I saw it, I thought, "HEY! I know that ship!" when I saw the interior of his ship--the setting of the opening for A New Hope. I thought it was a really cool touch. However, I then realized that the guy from LA Law, though he appeared in earlier movies, was never named until this one--and certainly not given any particular attachment to Padme. It was terrible plot work--something that should have been hashed out in about 1998 or so.
4) I liked the treatment of the temple, personally. Obviously, all the trained jedi are off fighting. Only the younglings ('younglings' should have been introduced in the last movie when Yoda was training them--we should have had this jargon already, before this movie) would be left in the temple. I'm fine with that. My big bitch about this scene is the alien girl on the Willy Wonka planet. The girl has a lightsaber--she's a goddamned Jedi!--yet, these clones make their betrayal known to her...and she realizes it...and then the kill her with barbaric blasters?? I doubt it--even if she is the crappiest Jedi. And we can't even assume that! They show like four Jedis get killed in that montage. I would have preferred an extended scene of ALL the Jedi getting wiped out--no dialoge, just a thirty minute Jedi-vs-clones montage with kickass music. Fine by me. Anyway, that scene just irked the hell out of me.

I do agree with you about the defiant lightsaber thing--that would have rocked.

5) No comment. Didn't really notice it, myself.

6) Jedis are traditionally terrible at warfare--they always choose the worst route. I offer the example of Kenobi-vs-Vader. Kenobi basically stands there--gives up the fight (though neither are fighting particularly well or hard) and lets Vader cut him down. Bad tactic. Here's another one: Yoda KNOWS that Luke is far too old--not too old like Anakin was at 6, but too old like Mark Hammil at 30--to begin Jedi training; he also knows that he has much fear and anger; and he knows that he will probably follow in his father's footsteps and become a planet destroyer for the darkside. What does he do? Train him anyway. Kenobi trains people against obvious better judgement, as does Qui-gon and Yoda. Idiots.

7) Actually, I think that Anakin was better acted than any character in any of the movies--except Han Solo, of course. When he is turned to Vader and has already committed those atrocities, he looks out on a pool of lava with--not just anger or rage or regret or sadness or whatever--he looks out on it with such a complex look of--something. It's awesome: the tears and rage and love and all that--it shines. However, I agree that the dialogue that Lucas writes is terrible--straight out of trashy romance novels. I found myself asking, "How can Anakin and Padme be in love? Have they ever teased each other? Is it purely physical?"

Really, look back at the first movies though--I think you will see that there is terrible acting throughout.

8) Remember, though--the Sith were apparently eradicated before these movies. The fact that there are any left at all is a surprise, let alone one right on the very doorstep of the government (Sith art? What Sith art--it's all futuristic).

9) An interesting suggestion, but as storytelling goes, I don't think it works for the main tale--maybe a mini-series.

10) No comment.

As to your conclusion, rather than feeling cold, I think you are just feeling old. These were movies made for young boys, not Poli-sci grad students with an affinity for sci-fi. You need to learn the force--feel it flow through you--and realize that that word, "Force", merely means "cool".

Love,
Micah

Posted by: Micah at May 25, 2005 02:53 AM